Thursday, June 19, 2008

Did Federal Conservative Cabinet minister Vic Toews declare it "opposite" week, and just not bother to tell anyone else? Because I can't think of any other rational reason why he would call Louise Arbour, who is retiring from being the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, a "disgrace."

Far from a "disgrace," Arbour is the epitome of the type of person I want representing Canada to the world.

She doesn't back down. A human rights abuse is a human rights abuse. Whether it's in Canada, the USA, Europe, Africa, Asia, South America.

Yes, she calls out Canada. Good for her!

If she didn't, the moment she dared to challenge other countries, we all know what the response would be. The usual "What right do you have to talk about things happening in our country, when your own country is abusing human rights?" line.

To have someone on the UN who so obviously isn't interested in towing her nation's line is something to be proud of, because it's what is needed for her to do her job. It takes people like Arbour to counter the cynicism that comes when people see UN human rights panels run by some of the worst countries for human rights. When she does that, she makes us look good.

I'm proud that this position in the UN was filled by such an amazing Canadian like Arbour. She is a voice of conscience in a world filled with politicians and people who will compromise.

And you know what? I'm proud that she's willing to point out when my country is wrong, because we are wrong. We are wrong a lot. We just had a huge apology this week for how wrong we were to force aboriginals into residential schools.

Like any nation, we have to be held to account for any human rights abuses perpetrated on our soil. Ignoring human rights abuses don't make them go away or solve them. It just makes them fester and poisons all of society.

And name-calling towards one of Canada's greatest ambassadors of human rights and peace? Now that's a disgrace.

3 comments:

matttbastard said...

Actually, Toews wasn't attacking Arbour for calling out Canada; he was (awkwardly) playing the antisemitism card:

"After Question Period had concluded, Hall Findlay asked Toews to withdraw his remark. He did not, telling the House, "the comments that Louise Arbour has made in respect of the state of Israel and the people of Israel are, in fact, a disgrace and I stand by those words."

[...]

"Arbour's controversial comments were made two years ago during the height of the Israel-Lebanon war during the summer of 2006.

"At that time, she issued a statement calling for the protection of civilians during that war.

""International law demands accountability," she said. "The scale of the killings in the region, and their predictability, could engage the personal criminal responsibility of those involved, particularly those in a position of command and control."

"Some, including Israel's Ambassador to Canada, Alan Baker, took Arbour's comments to be anti-Israel.

""I completely reject Louise Arbour's warning," Baker said at the time. "Israel doesn't target civilian concentrations, and I think that by merely giving such a warning she's jumping to conclusions and as a judge she should know better.""


Toew's idiocy notwithstanding (yes, asking for a so-called 'democracy' to respect basic human rights--I'd call that a near-dictionary definition of "disgraceful", as opposed to, oh, say, this), Baker's bigotry metre needs to be recalibrated (hint: do like the King of Pop said and start with the man in the mirror).

PegsPirate said...

Ahah.. this is definitely what happens when I start reading/writing something and stop, save and come back to it later on with my brain filled with mostly other things, alongside just a "wtf?!?!" on the brain that someone like Toews would question someone like Arbour who is top notch in my books.

So brain failure for me. I should have included a bit on how, since the Harper called Israel's actions against Lebanon a "measured response," Arbour's criticism of Israel also becomes criticism of Canadian policy.

Then maybe I would get a passing grade in reading comprehension. Maybe (let's not get too optimistic here)

I'm also fairly certain I had been planning to link to the Toronto Star article on it... which shows how out of it I was.

hysperia said...

I think the attitude of the Conservative government as a whole toward Louise Arbour has been just disgusting. Louise just didn't make a lot of friends because she had the courage to critisize EVERYBODY, including that great friend of Stephen Harper, George W. Bush. How COULD she?
Geez, as a Human Rights Commissioner, how could she NOT?